โ€˜๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—นโ€™โ€”๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—ฑ. ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿญ ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒโ€”๐˜๐˜‚๐—น๐—ผ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜ ๐Ÿ‘€

A Quezon City court just shut down Manases โ€œMansโ€ Carpioโ€™s attempt to block the House from getting the Duterte-Carpio income tax records tied to the impeachment complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte. The RTC basically drew a hard line: this fight runs straight into Congressโ€™ impeachment lane, and the court wonโ€™t step in in a way that undercuts that constitutional power.

In its May 6 ruling, QC RTC Branch 81 said Carpioโ€™s case was aimed at officials acting in their official roles inside the House justice committeeโ€”meaning the issue touches a coequal branch of government. The court added that if judicial review is being sought over a constitutional organ like that committee, the proper forum is the Supreme Court, not a trial court.

Bottom line: the RTC leaned on the Constitutionโ€™s wording that the House has the exclusive power to initiate impeachment cases, and said a writ like prohibition canโ€™t be used to freeze a body thatโ€™s exercising its legal mandate. In the courtโ€™s view, issuing subpoenas for the ITRs was part of the committeeโ€™s inherent powers in the impeachment process.

The ruling also took a swipe at the kind of โ€œevidenceโ€ brought into the petitionโ€”flagging that YouTube links and news reports arenโ€™t the kind of materials courts automatically treat as established fact. While the legal tug-of-war continues, the political clock is still ticking: the articles of impeachment are lined up for a House plenary vote on May 11, and one lawmaker claimed enough members have already signaled support to clear the threshold to send the case to the Senate.

Image from Senate PH FB

Related articles