๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—บโ€ฆ ๐—ผ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜?

The camp of Leyte Rep. Martin Romualdez is firing back hard at Peanut Gallery Media Network (PGMN) after the arrest of its founder, saying this isnโ€™t journalism under attackโ€”itโ€™s an extortion case wearing a โ€œfree speechโ€ costume. Romualdez spokesperson Atty. Elaine Atienza framed it bluntly: the real issue isnโ€™t criticism or exposรฉs, itโ€™s whether money was demanded in exchange for silence.

Atienzaโ€™s line is simple: if you have evidence of wrongdoing, you release it and file itโ€”you donโ€™t dangle it like a hostage. She claimed PGMN allegedly had material โ€œready to runโ€ for weeks but chose not to publish it, supposedly using it as leverage instead. That, she argued, doesnโ€™t just hurt Romualdezโ€”it poisons public trust by blurring the line between real media work and โ€œpay us or we post.โ€

On the enforcement side, the NBI confirmed the arrest of PGMN founder Franco Mabanta and four others, citing alleged robbery/extortion tied to the Cybercrime Prevention Act. The NBIโ€™s version: Mabanta had allegedly been attempting to shake down Romualdez since last year, with the supposed demand resurfacing recentlyโ€”including claims of a teaser being sent and an amount that ballooned as high as โ‚ฑ350 million. After the arrest, the NBI said other officials have started approaching them about possible โ€œblackmailingโ€ tooโ€”hinting this might not be a one-off story.

PGMN, for its part, is calling the arrest a โ€œsetupโ€ meant to silence them, insisting there was no extortion and no threats, and that only โ€œone sideโ€ was shown. But Romualdezโ€™s camp is pushing the case back to the ground: evidence beats narratives, and the courtsโ€”not social mediaโ€”will decide if this was legit watchdog work or a cash-for-silence operation.

Image from PGMN FB

Related articles