๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ: โ€˜๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด โ€˜๐˜†๐—ฎ๐—ปโ€™. ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐Ÿ‘€

Team Sara is punching back after the House justice panelโ€™s latest impeachment hearing, saying the case being laid out against the Vice President looks less like solid evidence and more like a stitched-together narrative. In a statement dated April 30, her lawyer Paul Lawrence Lim slammed the hearingโ€™s presentation on inciting to sedition and grave threats, claiming the materials shown were โ€œcuratedโ€ and even โ€œspliced,โ€ with key context allegedly left outโ€”then presented to the public like it was already the full story.

Limโ€™s bigger point: you canโ€™t convict someone on vibes. He argued that the hearing substituted opinion for facts and guesswork for real investigation, saying that kind of โ€œevidenceโ€ shouldnโ€™t clear even the basic bar of probable cause or a prima facie case. This response comes after the committeeโ€™s final clarificatory hearing on April 29, where the panel voted unanimously that probable cause exists on two impeachment complaintsโ€”meaning the process is moving forward even as Duterteโ€™s camp insists the foundation is shaky.

At that same hearing, the NBI submitted an affidavit tied to its investigation of Duterteโ€™s remarks from a virtual presscon that were treated as alleged threats against President Marcos, First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and former Speaker Martin Romualdez. The NBI also authenticated the videos shown, saying they were not edited and not AI-made. Duterteโ€™s side didnโ€™t just dispute the clipsโ€”they disputed the interpretation, calling the attempt to connect dots into guilt a โ€œgigantic leap in logic,โ€ and warning that implying accountability without direct proof is a shortcut that โ€œexcites judgment without evidence.โ€

Bottom line: Duterteโ€™s camp is framing the whole thing as a โ€œfishing expeditionโ€โ€”a hunt for something damaging after the complaints were filed, not proof that was already there. And with the hearings done, theyโ€™re now pushing the idea that if the accusations are real, they should stand up in a forum where rules are tighter and receipts matter: court-level standards, not committee theater.

Image from Inday Sara Duterte FB

Related articles