๐—•๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ โ‚ฑ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฌ๐—  ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ผ โ‚ฑ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐—  ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต? ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐——๐—ผ๐—ปโ€™๐˜ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต!

A courtroom moment just poured gasoline on the flood control mess: a state witness in former Sen. Bong Revilla Jr.โ€™s malversation case told the Sandiganbayan he has already returned โ‚ฑ130 million to the governmentโ€”even though he said his SALN net worth was only โ€œaround โ‚ฑ10 million.โ€

The witness, Gerard Opulencia, a former DPWH-NCR regional director, testified during the bail hearing tied to the Pandi flood control projectโ€”the one flagged for having no visible structures despite a โ‚ฑ92.8M price tag. Justice Karl Miranda pressed him hard, basically asking the question everyoneโ€™s thinking: if you werenโ€™t part of anything illegal, why are you returning nine figures?

Opulenciaโ€™s answer: restitution was required for him to be admitted under the Witness Protection Program, since he was originally among the respondents. The court didnโ€™t just let that slideโ€”Miranda flat-out warned that his immunity is conditional, and that lying can cost him that protection.

Bottom line: โ‚ฑ130M โ€œreturnedโ€ vs. โ‚ฑ10M โ€œdeclaredโ€ is not a clerical errorโ€”itโ€™s a credibility landmine. And in a case built on who said what, who delivered what, and who benefited, moments like this are exactly where the narrative either collapsesโ€”or finally connects.

Image from SenatePH

Related articles

Netizens question Tulfo on anti-China stance

Senator Erwin Tulfoโ€™s declaration that Filipinos had defeated foreign...

Cayetano pushes sports, art, culture in education Cabinet cluster

Senate Minority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano on Friday pushed...

Cayetano challenges DepEd to improve learning outcomes through smarter spending

With the proposed budget for education facing cuts, Senate...